St Andrews Bay Development (Kingask)
Issues raised during turbulent planning phase
Planning Phase News more general
Kingask News back to
Councillors unite to question hearings on golf
The Courier, 23 June 1999
The councillors who represent all four St Andrews wards on
Fife Council yesterday presented a united front to question developments in the
row over planned major golf and leisure developments in the area.
A statement from the councillors said that last weeks
special departure hearings - claimed by the councillors to have been arranged
in haste without adequate information available - left the administration
lacking credibility and trust.
The meeting ended in controversy, with criticism coming
from the chairman of the community council, Dr Frank Riddell, because there was
an apparent mixup over details of one set of proposals.
Dr Riddell said that the meeting had degenerated into an
absolute shambles and that what had happened had backed up the plea
made by his council and the local preservation trust for the entire issue to be
subjected to an independent Scottish Office inquiry.
Councillors Frances Melville, Jane Hunter-Blair, Sheila
Hill, and Jane Anne Liston yesterday said they decided to speak out jointly
after being swamped by comments from members of the public and local
Yesterday Councillor Melville made a statement on behalf of
all four, and said they were disheartened by the likelihood that previous
studies carried out in the area were about to be torn apart.
Why has the council gone to the expense of organising
comprehensive studies, with local consultation, into subjects like
transportation, landscape and strategic issues if it is about to disregard
This new stage of the process has been far too
rushed, and not enough facts are yet known to the locally elected
We are having an area development committee early
next week when we will be asked to come to a view on the plans for
Kingask, Feddinch, and Scooniehill before they are taken out of our
hands for a final decision.
Even now we do not have the information we require -
for instance the results of the crucial independent traffic study have still
not been made known.
All of this information should have been given to us
before last weeks hearings so that the discussion could have been
properly informed, and relevant questions asked.
The strategic overview being undertaken by the
council should have been completed and fully agreed before the administration
decided to tear headlong into hearings for which it was not prepared.
It was now clear, she said, that Dr Riddells comments
had been fully justified, and that for some reason the administration wanted to
press ahead regardless.
Local people are wondering just what is going on, and
we as councillors feel that we are being railroaded by a process dictated by an
administration which has an unassailable majority and which has seen some of
its members already express strong support or one of these schemes.
Councillor Melville said that it was also felt by the four
councillors that if there was a hitch with the Feddinch application, and it did
not require consideration at this time, it would create questions over any
moves or a call-in of the centres.
In that case there would be only two relevant applications,
and the matter could very properly be dealt with in East Fife.
Yesterday the planning convener of St Andrews Community
Council, Ian Goudie, said that the people of the town were due apologies
or at least plausible explanations after the Feddinch section of
the departure hearings degenerated into a farce.
Most perplexing of all, he said, was the implication that,
prior to the hearing, the applicant Michael Johnston and officials, failed to
communicate adequately with each other.
Are we supposed to believe that although Mr Johnston
showed the officials his new plans and pictures they thought he was doing so
only for their general interest and that he had no intention of making a formal
revision of his application.
Mr Goudie said that in view of the implausibility of the
explanations offered, it was hardly surprising that some people in St Andrews
were concluding that they had watched a piece of theatre.
They suspect that a decision was taken that a beauty
contest between the the golf-related applications required three contestants if
it was going to look at all credible.
Hence it was necessary to wheel the Feddinch
contestant on to the stage, propped up between Mr Johnston and the officials,
even though that contestant, in her current manifestation, had died some time
Mr Goudie said that what was certain was that the
convenience of the people of St Andrews came rather low on the councils
agenda last week. more Planning
Phase News more general Kingask News back to
Local News up to